In This Issue

The World Bank and the GEF: New Directions on Climate Change and Transport Issues

 

Steve Gorman
Executive Coordinator, World Bank-GEF


During the GEF’s third replenishment period (GEF-3), the World Bank continued to expand its portfolio of GEF cofinanced projects with total grant commitments reaching $3.1 billion by the end of FY06. This included working with our partners to develop projects in the two new focal areas of land degradation and persistent organic pollutants. Additionally, the World Bank responded to new and emerging priorities for the global environment by expanding its work most notably in adaptation to climate change and in transport. Going forward, I believe these areas will be of increasing strategic importance for the GEF during the fourth replenishment phase (GEF-4).


Managing Climate Risk: Integrating Adaptation into World Bank Operations
Climate change is intrinsically linked to the eradication of poverty—the mission of the World Bank Group. Infrastructure, agriculture, human health, water resources, and environment projects are exposed to the risks of physical threats to the investments, potential underperformance, and the possibility that projects will indirectly contribute to rising vulnerability by triggering investment and settlement in high-risk areas. It is, therefore, important to integrate comprehensive climate risk management into development planning, programs, and projects.


The analytical work, projects, and programs provide invaluable experiences on climate risk management but the awareness of climate risk in the World Bank’s work could be further strengthened.

 

I see several ways in which the World Bank Group with GEF support can help its clients better manage climate risks:

 

• Integrating climate risk management into the project cycle, by adopting early risk identification (for instance, by applying a quick and simple risk-screening tool) and following up throughout the design process, if necessary

• Integrating climate risk management into country and sector dialogues,

• Enhancing internal support for and coordination of climate risk management by expanding analytical work and capacity for cross-support by the Global Climate Change Team and the Hazard Management Unit of the World Bank and by actively developing climate risk management activities within regional departments

• Supporting proper financing mechanisms for adaptation, using the Investment Framework for Clean Energy and Development and using new funding mechanisms created under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol to leverage maximum adaptation results within the World Bank’s development activities and investments


By enhancing climate risk management, the World Bank Group and its GEF partners will be able to better address the growing risks from climate change and, at the same time, make current development investments more resilient to climate variability and extreme weather events.


Promoting Global Environmental Priorities in the Urban Transport Sector
Transport, a key infrastructure sector, acts as a stimulus to economic growth and is an important element of poverty reduction, regional and national development, and limiting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The growing energy use by the transport sector is increasingly contributing to climate change and degrading local air quality in developing country cities.


Under its Operational Program 11 (OP 11), the GEF provides grant financing to support the global environmental priority of mitigating GHG emissions from the urban transport sector. These projects demonstrate the importance of integrating global and local environmental priorities through policies and investments that translate into transport efficiency, air quality improvement, and reduction in GHG emissions.


The World Bank has implemented GEF urban transport projects in Manila, Mexico City, Lima, and Santiago that have promoted public transport through bus rapid transit systems, integration of multiple transport modes, nonmotorized transport, land use and transport policies, management of transport demand, and development of institutional capability for management of urban transport systems.

The World Bank is also designing regional and programmatic approaches under OP 11 to scale up urban transport improvements, maximize economies of scale, reduce transaction costs, strengthen local capacity for sustainable transport policies and programs, and capitalize on the synergies of transport interventions in cities with similar transport profiles.


I believe, future projects could more effectively mainstream environmental dimensions into urban transport planning by focusing on strategies for dealing with other heavy polluting modes such as freight transport and high-density intercity transport, and new market-based and information-based mechanisms. In addition, attention to transport demand in growing secondary cities, strengthening of market-based mechanisms to foster transport efficiency, promotion of private sector participation, safety and efficiency, and information technology are important ways of improving the environmental impacts of the urban transport portfolio.


Global Environment Facility